@article {Kaneshiro1980Sexual,
	title = {Sexual Isolation, Speciation and the Direction of Evolution},
	journal = {Evolution},
	volume = {34},
	number = {3},
	year = {1980},
	pages = {437{\textendash}444},
	abstract = {Various concepts of evolutionary biology are reviewed to emphasize the significance of premating isolation barriers in processes of speciation. Concepts such as sexual selection, genetic drift, and the Founder Principle appear to lend support to Muller{\textquoteright}s views that premating isolating mechanisms arise as by-products of natural selection in allopatry. Examples are presented in support of this view and in contrast to that held by Fisher and Dobzhansky, who envisioned such mechanisms as arising upon recontact of populations in which some postmating isolating mechanism had arisen. Additionally, a hypothesis proposed by Kaneshiro (1976) which enables interpretation of the one-sided mating preference (asymmetrical isolation) observed between populations of Drosophila is discussed. Such a hypothesis, if valid, permits inferences of direction of evolution among closely related species.},
	keywords = {drosophila, evolution, insects, mating, reproductive-isolation},
	url = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/2408213},
	author = {Kaneshiro, Kenneth Y.}
}
@article {Hall2008EXPERIMENTAL,
	title = {EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE THAT SEXUAL CONFLICT INFLUENCES THE OPPORTUNITY, FORM AND INTENSITY OF SEXUAL SELECTION},
	journal = {Evolution},
	volume = {62},
	number = {9},
	year = {2008},
	pages = {2305{\textendash}2315},
	address = {Evolution \& Ecology Research Centre and School of Biological, Earth \& Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales 2052, Australia; E-mail: m.hall@student.unsw.edu.au; Zoologisches Museum der Universitt Zrich, Winterthure},
	abstract = {Sexual interactions are often rife with conflict. Conflict between members of the same sex over opportunities to mate has long been understood to effect evolution via sexual selection. Although conflict between males and females is now understood to be widespread, such conflict is seldom considered in the same light as a general agent of sexual selection. Any interaction between males or females that generates variation in fitness, whether due to conflict, competition or mate choice, can potentially influence sexual selection acting on a range of male traits. Here we seek to address a lack of direct experimental evidence for how sexual conflict influences sexual selection more broadly. We manipulate a major source of sexual conflict in the black field cricket, Teleogryllus commodus, and quantify the resulting changes in the nature of sexual selection using formal selection analysis to statistically compare multivariate fitness surfaces. In T. commodus, sexual conflict occurs over the attachment time of an external spermatophore. By experimentally manipulating the ability of males and females to influence spermatophore attachment, we found that sexual conflict significantly influences the opportunity, form, and intensity of sexual selection on male courtship call and body size. When males were able to harass females, the opportunity for selection was smaller, the form of selection changed, and sexual selection was weaker. We discuss the broader evolutionary implications of these findings, including the contributions of sexual conflict to fluctuating sexual selection and the maintenance of additive genetic variation.},
	keywords = {communication, crickets, mating, orthoptera, sexual-selection},
	doi = {10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00436.x},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00436.x},
	author = {Hall, Matthew D. and Bussi{\`e}re, Luc F. and Hunt, John and Brooks, Robert}
}
