@article {Martin2007Optimal,
	title = {Optimal Conservation of Migratory Species},
	journal = {PLoS ONE},
	volume = {2},
	number = {8},
	year = {2007},
	pages = {e751+},
	publisher = {Public Library of Science},
	abstract = {Migratory animals comprise a significant portion of biodiversity worldwide with annual investment for their conservation exceeding several billion dollars. Designing effective conservation plans presents enormous challenges. Migratory species are influenced by multiple events across land and sea{\^a}{\texteuro} {\textquotedblright} regions that are often separated by thousands of kilometres and span international borders. To date, conservation strategies for migratory species fail to take into account how migratory animals are spatially connected between different periods of the annual cycle (i.e. migratory connectivity) bringing into question the utility and efficiency of current conservation efforts.},
	keywords = {biodiversity, conservation, migration, migratory-species},
	doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0000751},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000751},
	author = {Martin, Tara G. and Chad{\`e}s, Iadine and Arcese, Peter and Marra, Peter P. and Possingham, Hugh P. and Norris, D. Ryan}
}
@article {Venter2009Harnessing,
	title = {Harnessing Carbon Payments to Protect Biodiversity},
	journal = {Science},
	volume = {326},
	number = {5958},
	year = {2009},
	month = {December},
	pages = {1368+},
	abstract = {Initiatives to reduce carbon emissions from deforestation and degradation (REDD) are providing increasing incentives for forest protection. The collateral benefits for biodiversity depend on the extent to which emissions reductions and biodiversity conservation can be achieved in the same places. Globally, we demonstrate spatial trade-offs in allocating funds to protect forests for carbon and biodiversity and show that cost-effective spending for REDD would protect relatively few species of forest vertebrates. Because trade-offs are nonlinear, we discover that minor adjustments to the allocation of funds could double the biodiversity protected by REDD, while reducing carbon outcomes by only 4 to 8\%. 10.1126/science.1180289},
	keywords = {biodiversity, compensation, conservaton, copenhagen, redd},
	doi = {10.1126/science.1180289},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1180289},
	author = {Venter, Oscar and Laurance, William F. and Iwamura, Takuya and Wilson, Kerrie A. and Fuller, Richard A. and Possingham, Hugh P.}
}
